Coin-age of the day.

Veriabling.

Origin*: Prior coin-age on our coin age. 
Pre-coin-age:  prior posts that coin new words, although not necessarily sovereigns***

Structural Speculation

* already evolved from variabling to veriabling, not to emphasize bling. 
Not to be confused or separated from** coin age, or should I Say knot.
** line is reference to labels, inserted links are geometricks
*** timing is everything?

Note:  Everything may be a pun on the word or dimention, but it is the last inserted link at this time.  It spins off of the sovereigns reference and humorism(or Lincoln Logs) where I will refrain from more quantum leaps[!]  Now to proceed from the double asterisked line's determinant[?] ... regarding the knot Say: 
12/12  Power Point on Philosophy of Science and Economics: Positivism, Popper, and After

11/12 Fideism: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

10/12 PDF Russell On Denoting.

9/12 Wittgenstein's Poker Lost and Found

8/12 Jiggery Pokery

7/12 Philosophy Stories

#6 See (FP below) 4moolah

5/12 Realmiffications ?

4/12 (b.s.) ofor

3. relavent

2. segweigh

1. veriabling 

FP[!]) insert #6 a. Pre-Pan FRY. b. Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S.

[!] exception to the rule? i.e. anachronical links
[?] matrix pun dropped

[Closed Cap shun ? ] (FP1)

Epicyclical Poet Tree

The Ying and Yang of our Duelity*.

Life is the content in context**.


*this line is the lede / our Nietzsche the heading / the word is b.s.^
** Is this line the Hitch or Hedge hiker?

(FP!)  notation means to eventually transfer to (FP#)

^ I don't mean THE word, but duelity^^ is more like TryUnism. ***

*** I am not a #[!] nor just pun. (FP2)

^^ Spoiler Alert: Not actually, but I just found a legitimate prior user of the word, so I cannot claim coin-age, let alone be sure I have not run into it via its usage somewhere.
*^ / ^^  i.e. "duelity" is no longer my coinage. In fact I must revamp or revisit coin-age v. coin age and labels.  However I may have exfloE8ed TryUnism with Twryality. (Think Domino Theory and 4D Jenga!) (Jenga is already 3D, and Dominoes is not the theory but about Hoyle.)

Relavent

coin age: Relavent* means parallel to refudiate.
Or is it perp end icular? 

* not a mispell of relevant

Running gag ? !  "coin age" = segweigh

Who gets it?

Not the helium but the humor.
Rep. Grayson has a sense of humor and deals with serious issues on Bill Maher's RealTime.

[Back in the Box:(my comment forestalled by login difficulties)

I believe (Jiu Jitsu in Afghanistan) does fit into his "despise"(d) "left-right boxes"(metaphor) more than the writer understands. And also less into the martial arts metaphor than he also understands. To me, there is difficulty equating(or rather comparing) war with diplomacy and yet there is also an intelligence factor that differs. To mix boxes (or analogies might be better), you have Rumsfeldian intelligence and then there is what is really out there * . War obviously relies more on secrecy, while diplomacy relies more on openness, however you will still have those that play a war game, whether in or out of the box or whether they are with us or against us.

This is more than self-fulfilling loopiness.]

* potential inconcatenation** of intelligence and fear mongering or not being as out of the box or martial artistic as thought

** or is it deconcatenation***, but math and logic aside?

*** or unstrung Tao of Zen (in google we coin... a new word and failed)
[Third times a charm? Unconcatenation not.

As the Inner Tubes

Move me...
speaking of spirit or editing/updating/searching*...
Nuf(f) said?** (link added and spell checked)

* I was going to use a brand name for "searching",but will try to use natural verbs or nouns, like tissue not Kl**nex.
[and in my "searching" for "discipline" I brought up a missing link in more than one way.
**(I really did not know where I had employed the term (nuff said) earlier, when I employed it here.]
[but if I may coin: Inner Tubes above.]

Retro-Gate

Iran-Contra, WMD, October No-Surprise.

Not to preemptively prophet[!]
Not to bring back the draft,
but here are some posts held in draft.

Update: Muffin Gate: Miff In Gate


Pulled from draft today!
[Oops, a bit redundant]
Great Ledership
It's Mad[!]

[!] = sarcasm / spelling as intended = [sp!]
Close enough for journal work?

[10-3-11 Just to be clear, I believe in nuance and the law, but as different fields. What I can't say is that I am clearly satire, but the field might be mis-ledership***. But not to coin a new field, here are some other* perspectives, not to say they are the same field. (two video, two scroll overs)

*after the break: Stewart on NRA / teaching** to the test? NOT!]
** speaking of headings*** or retro
*** footnote to clarify later:
moral economics(INET/Robert Reich)& even later
BTW: sub-heading(Just to be clear...) I did not mean to wind-up a G'Ribble, but you can't judge a target by its aim, fear-mongers need a boogie-man. Aims are directions not bulls-eyes.

Definition: G'Ribble- grand ribbing and riddle

[*4] Ratigan and Perugia: processes

FEBRUARY FOOTNOTES PAGE 2014

2-26-14 : Pop Culture 4thD  Forward (Ironically) , (- Coin-age of the day., b,  c, Fear and Running, It is about time... -, Dimentionalism(sic) -, Over Helming. -, Place Holder? -) , [nature: A., B., C., D. 9/11 Shade of the Bush, E. The links that connect, F. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy , G. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]]

Footnotes Pages: Anachronisms earlier this month.

Pardon My Cheney[!]

Are they* going Dutch? 

My inference is in the pan, not the beef. 
Who pays for the good of the order? 


*1. First Thoughts: State Dinner Serves Apologetic Undertones
2. Reaganomics and Joe the Plumber
3.Change in the Age of Schism[!], 4., 5., 6. Bully Pulpit Not for Pitbulls

4(a/k) .(b.Pre-Pan FRY., c. Coin-age of the day. d., e., f., g.Public Intelligence, h.Tea Kettle Sports[!],  i.   , j.Tetrahedron Files, k. OW )  
5.(a-e) a. Fiscal Charting, c.Fear and Running, d.Recent Letters., e. BINGO!

Knitty Gritty

Schell Lacking ?*

*:  Who shells, C sells, at the she soar [?]

[Not to un-mbed!]
(oar) a. Divide to conquer?, b., c. The Read C?, d. Knitty Gritty , e. Ghosh Darn , f. Not that I am fixed... , g. The Fourth Dimention of Twain , h. Reigning Wags and Tales. , i. Lemon Ship , j. Dark Matter, Anti-Matter ,  k. Fn 4 point Oh June 2013! , l., m. See Pact, n.(b~ch), o. Footnote: interesting digs, p.Etch-A-Sketch 2.0 , q. Alter Under Construction
(ofor): A. Irony versus Hypocrisy, B. Weak End Update: Fun'n Edifying, C. Anticipation Project ^ , D.TGIF (two) , E. Lean Forward File , F. The Way Fourth?, G. Coin-age of the day. , H. GRN , I. Post-Pyth , J., K. "Feel the Love"? , L. The %th EleFont , M. Two Wrongs Make a Right? , N. Throwing the Game , O. N-oddly Enough... ,  P. Ideology , Q. The Bully... , R. Unprincipled ,  S. Vast Mainstream Conspiracy (VMC) , T. Realmiffication , U. HEAR HEAR! V. ENTERNEWSMEANT TODAY (and tomorrow) W. Forward (Ironically) ...

Tan Gents?
Lab L's?
A., B. Amidst the Pile and Piling On., C., d. Leaking Diplomacy, e. Executing (the) Constitution, f.Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**, g.Plausible Disciplination[?],  h. i.Questions on Vetting?, j. Hiding Behind the Straw Argument.
We 3 Kings? O W ?

Econ #$% ? (^)

Peter Paul and Pocket?
Red and Black and Grey all over.

Fiscal Krugman ? [!]




[Lede or * Ship?]


* bottoms up?
Later , V for Victim , A little knowledge is dangerous


a. The Bully..., c. Cost of Course, d. Lessons of War, EH? H. Post Newtonian Economics, j.It turns out... , k. The Be All and End All? , l. Hi Ate Us , m. Presidential SOTU , n. Coin-age of the day. o. Simon says 2 point or...? , p. Politics is local?


To Be Arranged , b.  hmmm? , c. Loose Lips and Sinking Metaphors , d. Blog-Oi-Ya-Bleep., eh? , F. Rat Races Van Mices? , G. The LESS THAN pentagonal file: , h. No0000![!]? (/\/) , i, , J? K!CAD (2 out of 3 be bad)


a. Fair and Balanced..., b. Genre Clash


Econ 101, 10, 1, L


Titanic Berg ?
QCON: TruthOut  (x)
Trick Question of the Day? (y)
FORGOTTEN HUMANITY!   (~)


(^) naut expletive
nor necessarily de-cap aster risks.
Econ 345?(6) or (lb. buck per cent?up)
OW: Chart ? ... math, English, Platonics~ Art
Grubergate: the knows under the elephants hump?(nose camel straw broke)
G O P : Governing Our Problem
 WON: War on Nuance

The Fourth Dimention of Twain

Objectivists (or more nuanced*?)

* wackamoles

Unreflective Objectivism or(^) ... ? oar {1}[!]

(^) 3d shadow ? {!}(\\m) (y/m)

Reality is a figment of our perspectives, while actuality is a product[!] of our euphemisms.


[!]
A.  Un-Exceptionalism
The Fourth Dimention of Twain
The Physics of the DOW
Brook No Truck ?[!]
e.
PC of Mini-Me
Reading List(UC)
h.
Fiddle Sticks^
j.
REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]
Tacky, tact, tack...
Off the Cuff
Re:Focus
HiTetra!
Catch-44

7th heave n ?(!)(3\10)
{a. Coin-age of the day., b. Place Holder?}
7 FS 7 not including 2 This is not just to play a pro/fit, but the reality of nature.  Every ship has a fiddle and a crock.  A picture is worth n-words. i.e. 3 languages (t)
1. FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2014, 2. Knot Even, 3. Over Helming.


.

ABA Lawyer of the Year

Alberto Gonzales

I'm not a lawyer and I had to coin a field to be something on these and other pages, but I will save my punditry for later. Here I will just add that not only is Gonzales the Lawyer of the Year and rumor has it that Mukasey is next year's winner, but what else they are is worth figuring out.

OK, I could not stay off my punditry that far or long, but my line of thinking is that unless the law is violated, it cannot get a hearing, and it is patriotic to violate the law for just that purpose, unless it has been preemptive in its scope. In that case, sometimes the law has been interpreted to not apply to some and others interpret not to look, while the real patriots cannot even be found.

Hmmm. Maybe trying to stay off a line, gets us somewhere, but it will be for who knows who to figure out. Congress?

[Original usage: "I'm not a doctor...".]

The Un-Revolved(~) Thread

Wittgenstein:

Facts?  3-mat?

(~) or resolved
(~)=alt sic/pun or irony [!]

(fp?)(links in order)
1. The lecture on the Tractatus.(picture theory)
2. (b.s.) Wittgenstein (a.) (b.), (3b) Post Romaticus ,(3c), F'N 3 , "Timing is everything." , P'P' la Pew , ( ) , Ghost Busters , Crooked Timber , Coin-age of the day. , Wittgenstein , (/) No Teddy , / OW , / Forward (Ironically)
3. (b.s.) Witt gen stein
Asymetric nature of ?, Logical Track it Us[!], Reading In Progress[***], (fp), (fp) (3a-e)
4. mat/label *

* anachronism (2c=3b), (2e=3c)
(~) indicative/asterisked &(~) explained
4m@ / Asymetric nature of ?, Logical Track it Us[!] , Post R.I.P. , We have met the yogurt , Going through Hegel or... , escapement? , Epicyclical Poet Tree , Forward (Ironically) **

** label's content needs updating but (b.s.)/blog searches will evolve(see 2b/~)
(i.e.) at this point in time Wittgenstein label includes 4a thru 4h.

Third Level **/4mat: or 4p?
1. Lecture on Tractatus (27:00)
2. Discussion of Metaphilosophy
3. Intro to Tractatus
4. Vienna Circle
(fp!)

Q. E. D. [!] [?] Anti-semantics or...**

New Meta Theory

The anthropomorphism of systems.**

Have your ad hominem and eat it too.

[The Digger You Deep?]*

*NFRY
**The personalization of math, geometry and logic.

[** + * =  Quantum Sovereignty ]

Is it possible this is the nexus of Science and Theology?
Is it Schroedingers' coin of epistemology? 
Is this support for the small "t", large "T": truth of Nietzsche?
[[ footnotes to reading*: "dangers in overemphasizing(...~...)"perplexed by the relation"{subject/object/rules}(5.)]] 
Now that may be the ticket!!!  Knot?^  The faith ~ science nexus.

{{Rough ramble:  3 dimensions are?  4this? 5th other!
Perpendicular perspective: x,y,z, space~time/point~sphere }}
{{{The result is in the balance.}}}
^/*

Economic Reform.

Not really.
But from my FB:
[ALSO THANX Rob for Obama Reformation.]

I recently heard, that the top 1%(or 2) account for the same as the bottom 50% in income and 90% in wealth held.[***] Just thought I would throw that in without too much other comment, it was very interesting to read the exchange, thumbs up, to... all.
But Yes, the point about investment and trickle down, the argument that(BTW, it is not raising taxes, it is an end to a tax cut, which the Republicans passed, which might sound the same, but is not, neither economically or politically) an end to the tax breaks will mean they will not be able to hire, is contrary to standard business and tax practices regarding what is deductible. It seems to me that it shows that there are a lot of people in business that are lucky to be there given their understanding of things, or it really doesn't matter how well one understands things to work, and probably a bit of each of these. But the Laffer curve is the biggest joke, not to mention the bell curve in general, but actually the joke is not in the curves but in the way people use them. OK, I did have more than I intended to comment*, but I must not forget my "nose under the camel's tent"(metaphor),[**] which represents the fear that change will be continued. 'nough said? (see the BTW)

OOPS!
I left an asterisk hanging: it regarded my metaphor...of knows or # of stakes OK, I just caught myself. . I am chuckling so hard, I better ponder before deleting or refudiating.
Ah, there's the rib!

[Speaking of Anachronism and Comprehensieveshun... I only now finished reading the NYT top link.]

[**] Not to coin a Palin, my original intent was the "camel's nose" but who knows? Only the Shadow.

[***] Thanks to Thom Hartmann...if we(I) have the numbers right. Meanwhile, I cannot believe there is not a reasonableness(constitutional pun) retort to this. i.e. I look forward to more context and links.

Index 9-21-11

Note bottom Link, indicates chronology or previous post.
Here I will develop a new MO.
[Under construction...probably obvious.] But I should note that all links have any edits, up till now, only as noted and dated. And in the case linked @"now", it is only some musical rearrangements and grammatical or punctuation corrections. Which up to recently have been very rare if not noted. i.e. dated or linked somehow

Same day run-ons(amendments) are [bracketed].
Note: Ribble*, D'Ribble, and G'Ribble
Navigation(see label)
Navigation T-point Oh! c= Tangent, Tea, T'em, etc. (Nav-2or3&pun.)
Boogie-T.** Yes Tangent back.

*Search "riddle" (see scroll over or click on)
But to un-coin(sort) the word: a ribble is a cross between a riddle and a ribbing.

-------
Re: MO intent...
Riddle search The Miller Team, Not to mention Randi and Lawrence, and Zombie Talk/Miller and Gold-man.

** boogey man/Zombies slash(/***)ledership
*** not a redundancy: / is sometimes spelled out for punditry sake.

C.P.U.

Citizens Progressives Untied [!]*

* Ctrl F WeGeBoard
(FP!)
1. Too Random...
2. Coin-age of the day. , Post-Pyth?
3. FP-3-14, Rat Races Van Mices?
4. Woh?
(*)
5. FP-4-13, Culture War.

Now WeGotEd! 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But back to CPU or Mary Shelly!
Or who cast the first stein ?

Speaking of timing

Or counting (or FOX)and follow-up(I could swear there are 6 legs unless it is on the other hand*.)
{italics not fully read yet but it is the point of departure}
{the point of arrival is not always originally intended, or that is the question.}
{note on labels, Navigation is regarding the blog, Navigation II is regarding our course changes. Maybe I should add Navigation III(a combo?).}
(Oh, and a leed change is also a challenge...to read)
* Third Way is point of tangent
[Maybe Thom Hartmann(AM1090) is coming to a realization, which I just missed(taking a call) regarding the power of Obama and his base and secondary potential thread. My points here are: Obama's base is not the liberal left. The Right's loss is the Left's loss, but the middle's gain.(I just coined** that.) My original metaphor*** was, as Republicans lose voters, they become more concentrated, while as Democrats gain voters they are diluted. ]
** critics please pick a better word for this new paraphrase of my original concept, other than coined, is in not that it is not making money for me, but I am just not sure that you coin a phrase. "turned" may suffice.
*** actually a metaphor would have a concept like Lemonade or Kool-aid as an ingredient, which apparently I have previously avoided saying directly at least.
[Still needing to read the italics link, Thom Hartmann and callers are still frustrated, and discuss the Marxist concept that things have to fail first. I am uncertain that is technically a valid name for it, but my point is that dynamically it will not work that way on two counts. It would take people who want it to fail(whatever it is) and it would take people giving up on changing it. That is why peace is much harder work than war, and why it is much harder and slower to make progress than to see the same things again.]
[Post-Pre-emptive Comment: or rather footnote regarding bubbles and cliffs and easing the wall down. Post Hartmann comment: one of my tangents was inspired by the concept of not enough mentionalism, a pun on the dimension of perspectives and whether there are two parties, or three or four or whether the labels matter. But the more the merrier or at least the more the discussion and the bigger the table.]
[Post Building on Change update: "That is why peace is much harder work than war, and why it is much harder and slower to make progress than to see the same things again." Bold added above, but link back provided as promised here.]
[Just in...Breaking or rather Re-Creating the mold: and I am only up to the word "defecit" in Steve Clemons question but I am having a feeling it relates to my just bolded and repeated quote in last bracket, and to wrap this up before it is too diffuse I seems to build upon earlier comments if not leeds.]